AC is dead(?)
|
2013-08-18, 08:38 AM
(This post was last modified: 2013-08-18, 08:40 AM by Victor.)
|
|||
|
|||
RE: AC is dead(?)
As reported in the shoutbox by @Nightmare, AC took themselves down:
Code: cubers.net. 172800 IN NS dns2.registrar-servers.com. Best regards,
Victor //victorz.ca Code: Your antithesis compares favorably with any high magnitude of pwnage. (-you > |p|, you < -|p|) |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
AC is dead(?) - by {KE}bluwarguy - 2013-08-10, 04:17 PM
RE: AC is dead(?) - by dm.mossberg590a1 - 2013-08-10, 04:36 PM
RE: AC is dead(?) - by {KE}bluwarguy - 2013-08-10, 04:42 PM
RE: AC is dead(?) - by asmanel - 2013-08-10, 05:06 PM
RE: AC is dead(?) - by dm.mossberg590a1 - 2013-08-10, 05:23 PM
RE: AC is dead(?) - by asmanel - 2013-08-10, 05:52 PM
RE: AC is dead(?) - by Victor - 2013-08-10, 06:16 PM
RE: AC is dead(?) - by dm.mossberg590a1 - 2013-08-10, 07:41 PM
RE: AC is dead(?) - by DeltaStrikeOp - 2013-08-10, 08:19 PM
RE: AC is dead(?) - by asmanel - 2013-08-11, 01:19 AM
RE: AC is dead(?) - by {KE}bluwarguy - 2013-08-11, 06:43 AM
RE: AC is dead(?) - by Nightmare - 2013-08-12, 09:41 PM
RE: AC is dead(?) - by ruler501 - 2013-08-12, 09:47 PM
RE: AC is dead(?) - by DeltaStrikeOp - 2013-08-12, 10:18 PM
RE: AC is dead(?) - by ruler501 - 2013-08-13, 12:08 AM
RE: AC is dead(?) - by dm.mossberg590a1 - 2013-08-13, 12:34 AM
RE: AC is dead(?) - by {KE}bluwarguy - 2013-08-13, 02:54 AM
RE: AC is dead(?) - by Victor - 2013-08-13, 09:29 AM
RE: AC is dead(?) - by Nightmare - 2013-08-13, 01:50 PM
RE: AC is dead(?) - by ruler501 - 2013-08-13, 04:24 PM
RE: AC is dead(?) - by Victor - 2013-08-18, 08:38 AM
|