logo ┌─[✗]─[[email protected]]─[~] └──╼ $./Pwn3d.sh Dear Admin/s, Greetings from ./Payload.sh [ Homepage: https://Payload.sh/ ] Your database has been dumped we have all '_users' in a .sql* Proof:'1','Victor','fd60ce6b028082526ca18e9a05f5af32','XYNd3d3h','Wow8TYxNI7D7tEnR3GQZrnTdb5snhus1LSKtsTglBbDV71VAu7','victor+acr[email protected]' Anyways not going to lie, things ain't preety for you. Next time keep your shit up to date & maybe take some time to patch your server. exit
Thread Rating:
2013-10-30, 07:42 AM,
#1
Shotguns
Might I suggest two shotguns, one (a primary) semi-automatic with shot and another (a pump) with slugs?
Post Reply Quote this message in a reply
2013-10-30, 09:14 AM,
#2
RE: Shotguns
That there was a marked difference can be divided into pump-action shotgun and a shotgun with a magazine-type boar(vepr)-12 (http://www.molot.biz/product-e/molot205.php). In the latter case the difference in the speed of reloading box magazine for 8 cartridges faster to insert, versus you can insert one cartridge in a tube.
Post Reply Quote this message in a reply
2013-10-30, 11:30 AM,
#3
RE: Shotguns
Only problem is that box magazine shotguns are notoriously unreliable and heavy, both of which are bad traits to have in a CQB situation. I don't think a pump action shotgun is necessary now that the M1014 has been buffed to be extremely powerful.

[Image: name_zps459dc421.gif]
[Image: cooltext1206791925_zps58ab60b5.gif]

"C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot; C++ makes it harder, but when you do it blows your whole leg off." - Bjarne Stroustrup
Post Reply Quote this message in a reply
2013-10-30, 04:39 PM,
#4
RE: Shotguns
Agreed. We've been working on balancing the M1014 for a long time now.

DSO
Windows 8 fanboy =D
"Not dead, can't quit"
Post Reply Quote this message in a reply
2013-10-31, 04:17 AM, (This post was last modified: 2013-10-31, 04:20 AM by camper.)
#5
RE: Shotguns
>>box magazine shotguns are notoriously unreliable and heavy
Add weapons failures due to overheating (time) and misfires (random)?
Post Reply Quote this message in a reply
2013-10-31, 08:21 AM,
#6
RE: Shotguns
I actually suggested adding jams at one point but it was dropped because 1. weapons rarely fail and 2. it ruins the gameplay by adding a random aspect that is based on luck.

[Image: name_zps459dc421.gif]
[Image: cooltext1206791925_zps58ab60b5.gif]

"C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot; C++ makes it harder, but when you do it blows your whole leg off." - Bjarne Stroustrup
Post Reply Quote this message in a reply
2013-10-31, 08:52 AM,
#7
RE: Shotguns
We could have the RPG be randomly pointing backwards lol.
Post Reply Quote this message in a reply
2013-10-31, 10:43 AM,
#8
RE: Shotguns
Quote:2. it ruins the gameplay by adding a random aspect
Not if it only applies to some weapons (rpg f.e.) and is non-permanent so that reloading solves the problem. It might help to balance gameplay as a weapon that has a, lets say, 5% chance of failing is less attractive.

The C Programming Language: combines the flexibility of assembly language with the power of assembly language.
Post Reply Quote this message in a reply
2013-10-31, 07:43 PM, (This post was last modified: 2013-10-31, 07:44 PM by DeltaStrikeOp.)
#9
RE: Shotguns
Battlefield has the Hawk 12, a pump shotgun with a detachable magazine.

I haven't played BF4 to understand how DICE balanced it.

I guess what I'm trying to say is that some things work for some games, while others work for other games.

ACR seems to be doing well with the M1014 as it is.

DSO
Windows 8 fanboy =D
"Not dead, can't quit"
Post Reply Quote this message in a reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »


Forum Jump:


Contact Us | Victor | Return to Top | | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication | Valid XHTML 1.0 | Valid CSS 2.1